outsidebones: (💀 clavicle)
Harrowhark Nonagesimus ([personal profile] outsidebones) wrote2022-06-05 03:52 pm
Entry tags:
ktiseos: all icons by flurry!! (Default)

[personal profile] ktiseos 2022-06-12 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
Do you intend to ask him of it?
ktiseos: all icons by flurry!! (batch3_0002_base)

[personal profile] ktiseos 2022-06-12 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
I believe I shall, as well. We've no true idea of this place, yet.

[so-- maybe he can say something about it.]
ktiseos: all icons by flurry!! (batch1_0003_base)

[personal profile] ktiseos 2022-06-12 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
I expect some of us will be less prepared for the eventuality in which he was, so I suppose that between us, we shall be ready for either.
ktiseos: all icons by flurry!! (Default)

[personal profile] ktiseos 2022-06-12 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
...I do not disagree. That shall likely be sorely needed, here.
ktiseos: all icons by flurry!! (batch3_0002_base)

[personal profile] ktiseos 2022-06-12 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
Within the Prism... such a thing was difficult, yes, but still needed. One needed to bear in mind that such knowledge could not be relied upon, and simply trust them regardless, while still acknowledging they could have been twisted by a force beyond their control.

It is not an easy exercise. Outside of that situation, however, I would think it is more critical to ask-- would the people you put your trust in tell you the truth.
ktiseos: all icons by flurry!! (Default)

[personal profile] ktiseos 2022-06-12 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Then, should it not prove forbidden, that shall be enough.

Should it be so-- reading them is more necessary than knowing they would or would not act. Picking up on what signs they may attempt to give.